Study of Spit-Tobacco Use Habits and Beliefs 

Of College Baseball Umpires

 

 

Presented to:

 

The National Collegiate Athletic Association

Committee on Competitive Safeguards and

Medical Aspects of Sports

 

January 15, 2004

 

By:

 

Amateur Baseball Umpires’ Association, Inc.

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

This national study is the first of its kind conducted for the NCAA to measure the beliefs, attitudes and behavior about the spit-tobacco use (smokeless tobacco) habits of college baseball umpires and their knowledge of the NCAA’s no-tobacco rule.

 

The Board of Directors of the Amateur Baseball Umpires’ Association, Inc., the largest membership association for amateur baseball umpires in the U.S., approved its involvement in a national program to educate amateur baseball umpires about the dangers of spit-tobacco use and make them aware of the “no-tobacco rules” that both the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) and the NCAA have instituted. 

 

This action came on the heels of discussions the NCAA Baseball Rules Committee had at its July 2002 annual meeting where it reiterated its concern for and support of a zero-tolerance policy for tobacco use.  The committee expressed its concern about the amount of tobacco use by college baseball field personnel and thought enough of the concern to make tobacco use and its elimination from the game its main point of rules emphasis in 2003.

 

The board also expressed its support for the ABUA to take a leadership role in developing an instructional strategy aimed at reducing spit-tobacco use among college baseball field personnel (e.g., players, coaches, umpires, other team personnel) and improving the implementation of the no-tobacco rule. 

 

Methods

 

Survey Instrument

 

In the fall of 2002, the ABUA retained the services of Susan Giarantano Russell to develop the survey instrument after contacting the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Ms. Russell serves as a tobacco consultant to the CDC.

 

The two types of spit tobacco discussed in this survey are chewing tobacco (Red Man, Levi Garret, Beech-Nut) and snuff (Skoal, Copenhagen).  The peer-reviewed survey instrument was divided into five sections.  The five sections asked for responses related to the following issues:

 

1.      Specific questions related to spit-tobacco use.

2.      Specific questions related to influences to use spit tobacco.

3.      Specific questions related to spit-tobacco knowledge.

4.      Specific questions related to the NCAA’s no-tobacco rule.

5.      Information about the umpire and the umpire’s experience.

 

 

 

 

Pilot Study

 

With the help of the National Federation of State High School Associations and the Missouri State High School Activities Association, the ABUA completed in February 2003 a first-of-its-kind pilot survey of spit tobacco use habits and beliefs of 800 high school baseball umpires in Missouri.  One of the more interesting findings from the pilot survey included a willingness on the part of 40 percent of the respondents to inform others about the hazards of spit tobacco.  In addition, a high percentage (92 percent) of respondents agreed that tobacco should not be used during practice or games.

 

Sampling

 

For this national survey of college baseball umpires, the ABUA requested the assistance of nearly every NCAA Division I, II and III conference that sponsors baseball.  The conference commissioner or umpire supervisor was asked to provide their umpire list for the sole purpose of participating in this study.  Of approximately 3,000 college baseball umpires, the ABUA procured a list of 1,724 umpires for this study.  From this group, 1,400 umpires were selected at random to participate in the study.  The surveys were mailed Tuesday, November 3, 2003, and included a self-addressed, stamped envelope to return the survey.  The deadline to return the surveys was Monday, December 1.   The ABUA mailed 1,400 reminder postcards to all participants November 17.  A total of 714 surveys were filled out and returned for a 51 percent response rate.

 

 

FINDINGS ABOUT SPIT-TOBACCO USE

 

Finding 1:         Nearly 10 percent of college baseball umpires currently use spit tobacco.  Nearly 31 percent of the surveyed umpires report they have quit using spit tobacco.

 

Finding 2:         Those who have never used spit tobacco cite three main reasons: no desire to experience the effects; worried about health effects; and using spit tobacco sets a bad example for children in the stands.

 

Finding 3:         For those who use spit tobacco, an alarming number – 36.2 percent – admitted using spit tobacco in some or all games.

 

Finding 4:         For those who use spit tobacco, use before and after the game is twice more prevalent than use during the game (26.1 percent)

 

 

FINDINGS ABOUT SPIT-TOBACCO-USE INFLUENCES

 

Finding 5:         For those who use spit tobacco and those who have quit, the biggest influencer of use is a friend who played baseball and used spit tobacco.  Surprisingly, almost 32 percent said they chose to use spit tobacco on their own, without influence. 

 

Finding 6:         Users are three times more likely than those who have quit to believe spit-tobacco use increases concentration.

 

Finding 7:         An alarmingly low percentage of users – 17.4 percent – strongly agree that using spit tobacco will harm their health, as opposed to 76.1 percent of those who have quit and 81 percent of the respondents who have never used spit tobacco.

 

Finding 8:         Only 72.5 percent of users agree or strongly agree that using spit tobacco will harm their health as opposed to 97.7 percent of those who quit and 97.1 percent of those who never used.

 

Finding 9:         The no-tobacco rule for players, coaches, team personnel and umpires has not, for the most part, discouraged umpires from using spit tobacco.

 

Finding 10:       Umpires who have quit or never used spit tobacco are more than twice as likely as spit-tobacco users to believe kids use spit tobacco because professional baseball players use spit tobacco.

 

 

FINDINGS ABOUT SPIT-TOBACCO KNOWLEDGE

 

Finding 11:       Only 46.4 percent of spit-tobacco users strongly agree they are aware of the health risks of oral cancer associated with spit-tobacco use, as opposed to 76.3 percent who have quit and 72.8 percent who have never used spit tobacco.

 

Finding 12:       Almost 50 percent of the respondents who have never used spit tobacco cite they have never received instruction about the dangers of spit tobacco.

 

 

FINDINGS ABOUT THE NO-TOBACCO RULE

 

Finding 13:       Nearly all of the respondents are aware of the no-tobacco rule in college baseball.

 

Finding 14:       Only 30 percent of spit-tobacco users strongly agree that tobacco products should not be used by student-athletes, coaches and team personnel during practice sessions and all game competition, as opposed to 68.2 percent of all respondents.

 

Finding 15:       Of current spit-tobacco users, 59.4 percent of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that tobacco products should not be used, as opposed to 85.4 percent of those who quit and 91.5 percent of the respondents who never used spit tobacco.

 

Finding 16:       Of current users, 44.9 percent of the respondents agree or strongly agree that ejection is the appropriate punishment, as opposed to nearly 72 percent of all respondents.

 

Finding 17:       Of the respondents who have never used spit tobacco, nearly 47 percent believe they can consistently enforce the no-tobacco rule with success and still maintain respect and control of the game, as opposed to only 28 percent of those who use spit tobacco.

 

Finding 18:       Of current users, 39 percent of the respondents strongly disagree with the notion that it is the umpire’s responsibility to enforce the no-tobacco rule during games, as opposed to nearly 17 percent of the respondents who have never used spit tobacco.

 

Finding 19:       Nearly all respondents (95 percent) believe that it should be the responsibility of the coach to enforce the no-tobacco rule among players and team personnel.

 

Finding 20:       Of current users, 55.8 percent of respondents agree or strongly agree that the result of trying to enforce the no-tobacco rule during a game is not worth the problem it creates, as opposed to 33.2 percent of the respondents who have never used spit tobacco.

 

Finding 21:       Of current users, 26 percent of the respondents would rather ignore the use of spit tobacco than confront the individual, compared to 14.2 percent of the respondents who quit or never used spit tobacco.

 

Finding 22:       Slightly more than two-thirds of the current users stated they would rather talk to the player, coach or team personnel about the no-tobacco rule rather than eject the individual from the game.

 

Finding 23:       Spit-tobacco use by the respondents does not impact the umpires’ willingness to inform coaches, players and team personnel about the hazards of using spit tobacco.  Across the board, roughly one-third of the respondents in all three groups expressed an interest in communicating the dangers.

 

Finding 24:       One-third of all respondents – and slightly more than 40 percent of users – expressed an interest in learning more about the dangers of spit-tobacco use.

FINDINGS ABOUT UMPIRING EXPERIENCE

 

Finding 25:       Slightly more than 61 percent of the respondents were between 41 and 55 years of age.

 

Finding 26:       Nearly all respondents were male.

 

Finding 27:       Slightly more than 82 percent of the users are between 31 and 55 years of age.

 

Finding 28:       For those respondents who have never used spit tobacco, slightly more than 75 percent were between 41 and 60 years of age.

 

 

In Conclusion

 

The ABUA views this survey as an important first step toward increasing awareness that will lead to a reduction in spit-tobacco use by college baseball umpires, players, coaches and team personnel. 

 

While 33.5 percent of all respondents expressed an interest in learning more about the dangers of spit-tobacco use, 41 percent of those at the crux of this issue – the users – were open to receiving more information about the dangers. 

 

To conclude on a high note, slightly more than 32 percent of the respondents expressed a willingness to inform others about the hazards of spit tobacco.  This bodes well for the success of a targeted cessation plan that the ABUA will propose in the near future. 

 

 

Confidential Amateur Baseball Umpires Survey

 

 

Overall Responses – N = 714

Currently Use Responses – N = 69

Used, but Quit Responses – N = 219

Never Used Responses – N = 426

 

 

The following questions ask about your spit-tobacco use.

 

1.         Have you ever used spit tobacco?  (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

No

59.7%

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes, but I quit

30.7%

n/a

n/a

n/a

Yes, I use now

  9.7%

n/a

n/a

n/a

 

 

2.         If you have never used spit tobacco, why? (Select all that apply)

 

 

Overall

Currently Use

Used, but quit

Never used

I am worried about health effects.

n/a

n/a

n/a

69.5%

Others would disapprove

n/a

n/a

n/a

16.2%

It is against my beliefs

n/a

n/a

n/a

26.1%

Because the no-tobacco rule applies to baseball practices and games

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

21.8%

It is my responsibility to monitor others on the field, so I shouldn’t

do it myself

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

28.4%

I have no desire to experience the effects

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

83.8%

It costs too much

n/a

n/a

n/a

11.0%

I was afraid of becoming addicted

n/a

n/a

n/a

  0.0%

It sets a bad example for children in the stands

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

38.0%

3.         If you have quit using spit tobacco, why?  (Select all that apply)

 

 

Overall

Currently Use

Used, but quit

Never used

I am worried about health effects

n/a

n/a

75.3%

n/a

I don't like it

n/a

n/a

36.1%

n/a

Others would disapprove

n/a

n/a

24.7%

n/a

Because the no-tobacco rule applies to baseball practices and games

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

29.2%

 

n/a

It is my responsibility to monitor others on the field, so I shouldn’t

do it myself

 

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

 

32.0%

 

 

n/a

It costs too much

n/a

n/a

14.2%

n/a

I was afraid of becoming addicted

n/a

n/a

  0.0%

n/a

It hurt my performance

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

  0.0%

 

n/a

It sets a bad example for children in the stands

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

29.2%

 

n/a

 

 

4.         During the past 30 days, on how many days did you use spit tobacco?   (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

0 days

n/a

  4.3%

94.1%

n/a

1 or 2 days

n/a

  7.2%

  2.4%

n/a

3 to 5 days

n/a

11.6%

  1.5%

n/a

6 to 9 days

n/a

  4.3%

  0.5%

n/a

10 to 19 days

n/a

14.9%

  0.5%

n/a

20 to 29 days

n/a

20.3%

  0.5%

n/a

All 30 days

n/a

37.7%

  0.5%

n/a

 

 

5.         How often do you use spit tobacco while umpiring a game? (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Every game

n/a

  7.2%

  3.3%

n/a

Some games

n/a

29.0%

  5.2%

n/a

Not at all

n/a

63.8%

91.4%

n/a

 

6.         Do you use spit tobacco at the following times? (Select all that apply)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Before the game

n/a

50.7%

  4.6%

n/a

During the game

n/a

26.1%

  5.9%

n/a

After the game

n/a

56.5%

  4.6%

n/a

Not at all

n/a

34.8%

86.8%

n/a

The following questions ask about Influences to use spit tobacco.

 

 

7.         Which of the following influenced you to begin using spit tobacco? (Select all that apply)

 

 

Overall

Currently Use

Used, but quit

Never used

Friend(s) who played baseball and used spit tobacco

 

n/a

 

43.5%

 

51.6%

 

n/a

Friend(s) who played other sports and used spit tobacco

 

n/a

 

10.1%

 

11.4%

 

n/a

Friend(s) who did not play baseball and used spit tobacco

 

n/a

 

20.3%

 

13.2%

 

n/a

Father who used spit tobacco

n/a

  4.3%

  3.7%

n/a

Other relative(s) who used spit tobacco

 

n/a

 

13.0%

 

  7.3%

 

n/a

Coach(es) who used spit tobacco

n/a

11.6%

16.4%

n/a

Amateur umpire(s) who used spit tobacco

 

n/a

 

10.1%

 

16.9%

 

n/a

Professional baseball player(s) who used spit tobacco

 

n/a

 

17.4%

 

19.2%

 

n/a

Professional umpire(s) who used spit tobacco

 

n/a

 

13.0%

 

14.6%

 

n/a

Advertisements for spit tobacco

n/a

  4.3%

  3.7%

n/a

No one, I made my own decision

n/a

31.9%

20.5%

n/a

None of the above

n/a

  4.3%

  3.2%

n/a

8.       I feel that using spit tobacco increases my ability to concentrate. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

n/a

  5.8%

  1.0%

n/a

Agree

n/a

11.6%

  4.3%

n/a

Neither agree nor disagree

n/a

40.6%

25.4%

n/a

Disagree

n/a

15.9%

17.7%

n/a

Strongly disagree

n/a

26.1%

51.7%

n/a

 

 

9.         Using spit tobacco will harm my health. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

73.3%

17.4%

76.1%

81.0%

Agree

21.6%

55.1%

21.6%

16.1%

Neither agree nor disagree

  4.6%

23.2%

  1.8%

  2.9%

Disagree

  0.4%

  2.9%

  0.5%

  0.0%

Strongly disagree

  0.1%

  1.4%

  0.0%

  0.0%

 

 

10.       The no-tobacco rule for baseball players, coaches, team personnel* and umpires has discouraged me from using spit-tobacco products. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

18.7%

17.4%

20.7%

17.9%

Agree

10.2%

20.3%

13.4%

  6.9%

Neither agree nor disagree

38.4%

21.7%

40.1%

40.3%

Disagree

15.6%

29.0%

12.4%

15.0%

Strongly disagree

17.0%

11.6%

13.4%

19.8%

*team personnel include the athletic trainer, equipment manager, etc.

 

11.       Kids use spit tobacco because professional baseball players use it. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

24.2%

  8.7%

19.7%

29.1%

Agree

50.6%

26.1%

54.1%

52.7%

Neither agree nor disagree

15.7%

30.4%

17.4%

12.4%

Disagree

  7.5%

24.6%

  7.8%

  4.5%

Strongly disagree

  2.0%

10.1%

  0.9%

  1.2%

 

 

The following questions ask about your spit-tobacco knowledge.

 

12.       I am aware of the health risks of oral cancer that are associated with using spit tobacco affecting the mouth, tongue, cheek, gums, lips and throat (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

71.3%

46.4%

76.3%

72.8%

Agree

27.3%

46.4%

23.7%

26.0%

Neither agree nor disagree

  1.3%

  7.2%

  0.0%

  0.9%

Disagree

  0.0%

  0.0%

  0.0%

  0.0%

Strongly disagree

  0.1%

  0.0%

  0.0%

  0.2%

 

 

13.       During the time you have umpired baseball, have you ever received instruction about the dangers of spit-tobacco use? (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Yes

52.7%

63.8%

57.8%

48.2%

No

43.6%

33.3%

38.1%

48.2%

Not sure

  3.7%

  2.9%

  4.1%

  3.6%

 

 

The following questions ask about the no-tobacco rule.

 

 

14.       I am aware of the college and high school baseball rules that prohibit the use of all tobacco products by student-athletes, coaches, and team personnel during practice sessions and game competition. (Select one) 

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Yes

99.4%

100%

99.5%

99.3%

No

  0.6%

  0.0%

  0.5%

  0.7%

 

 

15.       I believe that tobacco products should not be used by student-athletes, coaches, and team personnel during practice sessions and game competition. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

68.2%

30.4%

63.0%

76.9%

Agree

18.4%

29.0%

22.4%

14.6%

Neither agree nor disagree

  7.4%

13.0%

  7.8%

  6.4%

Disagree

  4.1%

13.0%

  5.5%

  1.9%

Strongly disagree

  2.0%

14.5%

  1.4%

  0.2%

 

 

16.       It is appropriate punishment for any player, coach or team personnel to be ejected from the game because he or she was using spit tobacco. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

45.4%

24.6%

36.1%

53.6%

Agree

26.5%

20.3%

32.0%

24.7%

Neither agree nor disagree

10.4%

14.5%

10.0%

  9.9%

Disagree

13.6%

21.7%

17.8%

10.1%

Strongly disagree

  4.1%

18.8%

  4.1%

  1.6%

 

 

17.       I believe I can consistently enforce the no-tobacco rule during baseball games with success and still maintain respect and control of the game. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

41.7%

27.5%

36.1%

46.8%

Agree

34.9%

39.1%

37.9%

32.7%

Neither agree nor disagree

  7.9%

  8.7%

  8.7%

  7.3%

Disagree

11.6%

13.0%

13.2%

10.6%

Strongly disagree

  3.9%

11.6%

  4.1%

  2.6%

 


18.       I intend to eject any individual – player, coach, or team personnel – from the game who violates the no-tobacco rule. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

35.8%

23.2%

31.5%

40.0%

Agree

38.3%

33.3%

40.2%

38.1%

Neither agree nor disagree

12.3%

15.9%

13.7%

11.1%

Disagree

10.8%

18.8%

11.4%

  9.2%

Strongly disagree

  2.8%

  8.7%

  3.2%

  1.6%

 

19.      I personally believe it is the umpire’s responsibility to enforce the no-tobacco rule during baseball games. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

16.5%

11.6%

  9.6%

20.9%

Agree

29.2%

20.3%

29.7%

30.4%

Neither agree nor disagree

10.7%

  7.2%

10.0%

11.5%

Disagree

23.6%

21.7%

30.1%

20.5%

Strongly disagree

20.1%

39.1%

20.5%

16.7%

 

 

20.       It should be the responsibility of the coach to enforce the no-tobacco rule among players and team personnel. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

68.1%

60.3%

67.1%

69.9%

Agree

26.9%

33.8%

28.8%

24.9%

Neither agree nor disagree

  3.2%

  4.4%

  2.3%

  3.6%

Disagree

  1.1%

  0.0%

  1.8%

  0.9%

Strongly disagree

  0.6%

  1.5%

  0.0%

  0.7%

 

 

21.       The result of trying to enforce the no-tobacco rule during a baseball game is not worth the problems it creates. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

10.0%

27.9%

  8.7%

  7.8%

Agree

27.2%

27.9%

30.6%

25.4%

Neither agree nor disagree

17.5%

22.1%

16.4%

17.3%

Disagree

33.0%

16.2%

36.1%

34.1%

Strongly disagree

12.3%

  5.9%

  8.2%

15.4%

 

 

22.       I would rather ignore the use of spit tobacco by a player, coach, team personnel or other umpire than confront the individual.  (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

  2.7%

  8.8%

  2.3%

  1.9%

Agree

12.7%

17.6%

11.9%

12.3%

Neither agree nor disagree

11.4%

13.2%

13.2%

10.2%

Disagree

48.1%

47.1%

51.6%

46.4%

Strongly disagree

25.1%

13.2%

21.0%

29.1%

 

 

23.       I would rather talk to the player, coach, team personnel or umpire about the no-tobacco rule rather than eject the individual from the game. (Select one) 

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

19.0%

29.4%

20.5%

16.5%

Agree

38.5%

39.7%

38.8%

38.1%

Neither agree nor disagree

11.3%

  8.8%

11.4%

11.6%

Disagree

21.5%

11.8%

20.5%

23.6%

Strongly disagree

  9.7%

10.3%

  8.7%

10.2%

 

 

24.       My enforcement of the no-tobacco rule negatively impacts my effectiveness in controlling on-field personnel.

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

  5.2%

  5.9%

  6.0%

  4.7%

Agree

13.7%

13.2%

12.8%

14.2%

Neither agree nor disagree

15.1%

20.6%

13.8%

14.9%

Disagree

40.3%

29.4%

45.9%

39.1%

Strongly disagree

25.7%

30.9%

21.6%

27.0%

 

 

25.       It would be difficult to get along with the players, coaches, team personnel and other umpires if I tried to enforce every violation of the no-tobacco rule. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Strongly agree

  8.8%

11.6%

  7.8%

  9.0%

Agree

22.2%

26.1%

27.4%

18.9%

Neither agree nor disagree

12.6%

26.1%

10.5%

11.6%

Disagree

38.9%

23.2%

39.3%

41.3%

Strongly disagree

17.4%

13.0%

15.1%

19.3%

 

 

26.     I would be willing to inform baseball coaches, players and team personnel about the hazards of using spit tobacco. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Yes

32.2%

26.1%

34.1%

32.2%

No

54.9%

62.3%

51.2%

55.6%

Don’t Know

13.0%

11.6%

14.7%

12.3%

 

 

27.       I would be interested in learning more about the dangers of spit-tobacco use. (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Yes

33.5%

40.6%

28.7%

34.8%

No

60.1%

55.1%

63.9%

59.0%

Don’t Know

  6.4%

  4.3%

  7.4%

  6.2%

 

 

 

The following questions ask about you and your umpiring experience.

 

28.       How old are you? (Select one) 

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

15 – 19 years old

  0.0%

  0.0%

  0.0%

  0.0%

20 – 25 years old

  1.5%

  4.3%

  1.8%

  0.9%

26 - 30 years old

  4.8%

  4.3%

  5.5%

  4.5%

31 - 35 years old

  8.1%

10.1%

11.9%

  5.9%

36 - 40 years old

11.9%

14.5%

16.9%

  9.0%

41 - 45 years old

17.8%

30.4%

18.3%

15.6%

46 - 50 years old

20.9%

14.5%

17.8%

23.6%

51 – 55 years old

22.6%

13.0%

19.2%

25.9%

56 – 60 years old

  8.1%

  4.3%

  5.0%

10.4%

61 years of age or older

  4.1%

  4.3%

  3.7%

  4.2%

 

 

29.       What is your gender?  (Select one) 

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Female

  0.6%

  0.0%

  0.0%

  0.9%

Male

99.4%

100%

100%

99.1%

 

 

30.       How do you describe yourself   (Select one)

 

  

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

American Indian or Alaskan Native

  0.4%

  1.5%

  0.5%

  0.2%

Asian or Oriental American

  0.3%

  1.5%

  0.5%

  0.0%

Black or African American

  4.0%

  1.5%

  3.2%

  4.9%

Hispanic or Latino

  3.2%

  1.5%

  4.2%

  2.9%

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander

 

  0.1%

 

  0.0%

 

  0.0%

 

  0.2%

White or Caucasian

91.9%

94.1%

91.7%

91.7%

 

 

31.       At which level do you umpire baseball games? (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

College

30.3%

36.2%

36.4%

26.1%

College and High School

69.7%

63.8%

63.6%

73.9%

 

 

32.       Including this baseball season, how many years have you umpired baseball games? (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

1 - 5 years

  2.9%

  8.7%

  3.7%

  1.4%

6 – 10 years

10.9%

  4.3%

12.0%

11.3%

11 – 15 years

22.7%

20.3%

20.4%

24.3%

16 – 20 years

18.9%

27.5%

19.0%

17.3%

21 – 25 years

19.4%

13.0%

20.8%

19.8%

26 or more years

25.3%

26.1%

24.1%

25.8%

 

 

33.       Within the last year, approximately how many games have you umpired? (Select one)

 

 

Overall

Currently use

Used, but quit

Never used

Less than 20 games

  2.0%

  1.4%

  3.3%

  1.4%

21 – 30 games

  2.3%

  1.4%

  4.2%

  1.4%

31 – 40 games

  5.9%

  7.2%

  7.0%

  5.1%

41 – 50 games

  9.4%

14.5%

10.2%

  8.2%

51 – 60 games

10.2%

11.6%

11.2%

  9.4%

61 – 70 games

10.3%

13.0%

10.7%

  9.6%

71 – 80 games

12.2%

13.0%

11.6%

12.3%

81 – 90 games

  8.2%

  8.7%

  7.0%

  8.7%

91 – 100 games

  8.2%

  7.2%

  4.7%

10.1%

More than 100 games

31.5%

21.7%

30.2%

33.7%

 

 

 

 

Respondents’ Comments

 

 

  1. I strongly believe that the enforcement must start from ADs, coaches, then umpires.  Why should a player comply when they see coaches use tobacco in practice and in off-field situations?  Umpires have to be the enforcers when schools should be against rule violations!

 

  1. The tobacco rule is especially difficult to enforce with “old timers” who have been chewing “forever” and don’t want to change.  Same goes for old-time umpires who still chew at the college and/or high school level.  They think they are above the rule!!!

 

  1. It should be the responsibility of the coach/institution/NCAA to inform about the hazards of spit tobacco, not umpires.

 

  1. I give one warning in a game (day) and only